|
Post by Admin on Jan 27, 2015 1:16:33 GMT
Whatever singularity, a being whose community is mediated not by any condition of belonging, nor by simple absence of conditions, but by belonging itself. The novelty of the coming politics is that it will no longer be a struggle for the conquest of control of the State, but a struggle between the State and the non-State (humanity). This has nothing to do with the simple affirmation of the social in opposition to the State that has often found expression in the protest. Whatever Singularity cannot form a societas because they do not possess any identity to syndicate nor any bond of belonging for which to seek recognition. What the State can not tolerate in any way, is that the singularities form a community without affirming an identity, that humans co-belong without any representable condition of belonging. So what has to be avoided is an inclusion in some identity, but the possibility of the whatever itself being taken up without an identity is a threat the State cannot come to terms with. Being radically devoid of any representable identity. Whatever singularity, which wants to appropriate belonging itself, its own being-in-language, and thus rejects all identity and every condition of belonging, is the principal enemy of the State, whatever these singularities peacefully demonstrate. chapter shekinah
|
|